EC Cleaners Network · Multi-Site Change Control
A temporary closure, refit or rebrand should change the site’s portfolio status, not erase its kitchen extract history.
Keep the existing reports, due dates, access issues and open actions visible while the property changes. Then review the system again against the equipment, menu, operating hours and ventilation arrangement that will exist when the site reopens.
Which sites are closing, refitting, rebranding or reopening?
Send the site list, planned dates, existing extract records and what is changing at each property. Include new equipment, menu, layout, ductwork, fan, access or operating-hour changes where known.
Search and Submit Ltd uses your details to respond and coordinate the enquiry, including sharing relevant information with appropriate independent specialists. Read our Privacy Policy. Please omit unrelated personal or sensitive information.
Do not remove a temporarily closed site from the compliance programme
A closed kitchen may stop generating new grease, but existing contamination, unresolved access problems, missing evidence and mechanical issues do not disappear because trading has paused.
Keep the property and extract system on the portfolio register with a changed operating status. Record the closure date, expected reopening date, current due position and any work planned during the closure.
Pause the operation. Preserve the record.
Useful portfolio statuses during site change
Temporarily closed
The kitchen is not trading but the existing system history and open actions remain live.
Refit in progress
Equipment, layout, canopy, ductwork, fan, controls or replacement air may be changing.
Access remediation in progress
The closure window is being used to address previously inaccessible sections.
Awaiting recommissioning
The physical works are complete but the ventilation or associated systems still need appropriate competent checks.
Pre-opening evidence review
Reports, cleaning evidence, access records and technical information are being checked before reopening.
Reopened under review
The site is trading again but the new operating pattern has not yet been fully reflected in the long-term maintenance schedule.
A refit can change the assumptions behind the old ventilation system
HSE says its catering ventilation guidance is useful for assessing existing systems and planning new or refurbished kitchens. It says the caterer should provide information about maximum demand, the amount and type of equipment, menu, meals and staffing when ventilation is being considered.
That matters during a rebrand or refit because the physical duct route may remain while the cooking operation changes substantially.
Review equipment, menu and operating hours before reopening
A site that reopens under a new brand may cook different food, use different appliances, trade for longer hours or produce a different number of meals. Those changes can alter both ventilation demand and grease accumulation.
Do not assume the old cleaning interval remains suitable simply because the old ductwork and fan remain in place.
The inherited system belongs to the building. The maintenance assumptions belong to the way the kitchen is actually used.
Use the closure window to resolve access problems where practical
Refurbishment can create a rare opportunity to reach ductwork that is normally hidden by ceilings, boxing, equipment or trading constraints. EC’s access guidance already identifies refit and reopening periods as useful opportunities to address repeat maintenance obstacles where practical.
If new access is installed, keep it as a separate action until the previously inaccessible section has actually been inspected, cleaned or otherwise dealt with within the appropriate specialist scope.
Keep overdue actions visible through the closure
A site may already have an overdue clean, missing report, partial clean, fan issue or external action when the closure begins. Add the closure status, but do not delete the original exception.
Where the works themselves will resolve the issue, link the action to the refit programme. Where the issue remains outside the works scope, keep a separate owner and next step.
What if the site has been closed for months?
Treat old certificates and reports as historic evidence rather than proof of current readiness. The system may still contain grease deposited before closure, and fans, controls or other components may need maintenance independently of how much the kitchen has traded.
Before returning the site to routine portfolio status, review the inherited evidence alongside the current system and intended reopened operation.
Where gas or solid fuel is changing, use the appropriate specialist route
HSE says adequate make-up air is particularly important for gas-fired appliances and that solid-fuel appliances require suitable extraction because carbon monoxide is produced during normal operation.
A rebrand that introduces gas, charcoal, wood or another different cooking process should therefore be treated as a ventilation and safety change, not just a cleaning-schedule update.
Update the system scope after physical changes
If the refit changes the canopy, duct route, fan, discharge, controls or replacement-air system, update the portfolio record so the next contractor is not working from an obsolete scope.
BESA describes DW/172 as the definitive industry reference for the design, installation and maintenance of commercial kitchen ventilation systems and notes that it reflects modern cooking techniques and catering equipment design.
Historic refit project context
Refits can change how an existing extraction system is used even where much of the original installation remains. The portfolio record should therefore follow the changed physical system and changed operating kitchen, not just the property address.
Historic EC Cleaners project imagery is used to illustrate restaurant refit and reopening context. It is not presented as evidence about any current multi-site property.
A practical site-change workflow
- Change the operating status. Mark the site closed, refitting or awaiting reopening without deleting the existing system record.
- Freeze the current evidence position. Keep the latest report, certificate, due date, access status and open actions.
- Record the planned changes. Equipment, menu, layout, canopy, ductwork, fan, controls, replacement air and trading hours.
- Use the works window. Address known access or enabling-work problems where practical.
- Update the system scope. Replace obsolete drawings, descriptions and access notes after physical changes.
- Obtain the required specialist checks. Cleaning, ventilation, mechanical, electrical, gas or other competent input as appropriate.
- Collect close-out evidence. Keep reports, certificates, commissioning information and remaining actions with the site record.
- Review the cleaning interval. Set the next point using the reopened operating pattern and current evidence.
- Return the site to routine status. Only when the central record reflects the new kitchen and unresolved exceptions remain visible.
What EC can help organise
Site status changes
Closed, refit, reopening and routine sites can remain visible inside one portfolio register.
Inherited evidence
Existing reports, certificates and open actions can remain connected to the site through the change programme.
Changed scope
New equipment, access and system information can be separated from obsolete pre-refit records.
Reopening handover
Returned evidence and unresolved actions can be organised before the property returns to the normal maintenance cycle.
EC does not design, commission, technically approve or determine whether a modified ventilation system is suitable or safe. Those conclusions remain with the competent designers, contractors, engineers and other professional parties within their appointed scopes.
Refits, rebrands and temporary closures: frequently asked questions
What should happen to a kitchen extract compliance schedule when a site closes temporarily?
Keep the site on the portfolio register but change its operating status. Record the closure date, reason, expected reopening date, current evidence, outstanding actions and whether any maintenance, refit or inspection work will take place during the closure.
Does a temporary closure reset the kitchen extract cleaning schedule?
No. A closure does not by itself prove the system is clean or remove existing grease, access problems or outstanding maintenance. The next review point should be reconsidered when the site reopens using current evidence and the intended operating pattern.
What if the site is being refitted or rebranded?
Record changes to cooking equipment, menu, canopy position, ductwork, fan, replacement air, controls and access. HSE says ventilation design and assessment should consider the equipment, menu, maximum demand and kitchen use, so material changes may require competent ventilation review.
Should a closed site remain marked overdue?
Keep the original overdue or unresolved action visible, but add the closure status so the central team can distinguish a paused programme from a genuinely completed action.
What if the refit creates better access to the ductwork?
Use the works period to review previously inaccessible sections where practical. Access improvements should be recorded as a separate action and linked to the next inspection, cleaning or evidence requirement.
When should the cleaning interval be reset after reopening?
Only after the current operating pattern, inherited condition and latest evidence have been reviewed. The interval should reflect the reopened kitchen rather than automatically resuming the old calendar.
What should central teams collect before a reopened site returns to routine status?
Collect the updated system scope, latest cleaning or inspection evidence, ventilation or commissioning information where relevant, access changes, contractor reports, open actions and the new operating pattern.
Do several sites have closures, refits, rebrands or reopening dates to coordinate?
Send the site list, planned changes and existing records. EC can help organise the portfolio status, inherited evidence, changed system information and open actions so the programme remains traceable while the properties change.
Responsibility statement:
EC Cleaners Network is operated by Search and Submit Ltd. Search and Submit Ltd does not inspect, clean, test, survey, design, remediate, certify or technically approve kitchen extraction or ventilation systems. Independent appointed contractors and competent professionals remain responsible for technical assessment, safe working, quotations, physical delivery, reporting, certification and professional conclusions within their appointed scope.
TR19® Grease and TR19® Air are BESA specifications. References are descriptive and no BESA endorsement of or affiliation with EC Cleaners Network is claimed.